I recently met a man who works as an assistant to a politician and he told me what he thinks about the masses who vote and I imagine he was reiterating the views of his boss as well. They both graduated from prestige universities.
He regarded the masses with scorn and apprehension. He paid lip service to Democracy in principle but NOT in practice.
Everything he stood for was an attempt to delegitimize the results of the people’s vote.
He thought that there was “too much” Democracy because it entrusts too much influence to low informed, over emotional people.
He cited two examples: The Brexit vote and Trump’s election. He favored the current establishment idea of a second referendum vote on Brexit to cancel out the first vote. And it was the great “unwashed” deplorables that elected Trump.
He repudiated the results of these two earthquakes because he didn’t like the results.
In general he thought allowing the votes of the populace to determine important issues a threat to Democracy.
He wanted more power to be exercised by the Elite Establishment which are an insulated political class.
In his mind some voters (the elite) were more equal than others (the populace).
So, what’s happened to: Government of the People, by the People and for the People?
It seems that the Establishment always tries to SCARE the electorate into okaying things that the electorate didn’t want and then they go ahead and do it.
After listening to this man, who fancied himself a member of the Elite, I had to write a blog on the “Elite Repudiating the People’s Will”.
So, I met up with my buddy, Tom, to have a discussion on the Elite and Democracy, on which I would base my blog.
“Hey Tom, give me a definition of Democracy.”
“Well Dave, it’s a system of government where the citizens exercise power by voting and the majority wins.
In our system it’s called representative democracy, where the people elect reps from among themselves and these reps are supposed to act in the interests of their constituents.”
“That just about sums it up, Tom. Now, I will give you a definition of “The Elite Establishment”.
It’s middle and upper class professionals who dominate politics, culture, education and the media. They try to enforce conformity, they want to regulate speech and distill the truth for the masses.”
“That’s it, Dave. And I would add they are a closed group that want to perpetuate themselves and their position. They are insulated from the wider population and they want to make sure their interests are met.”
“So Tom, what recently have the Establishment repudiated?”
“They repudiated the Brexit referendum results and the election of Trump, in so doing they denied the validity of the results and they refused to accept them because they didn’t correspond to their interests.”
“SO, THE VOTES FOR THESE TWO POLITICAL EARTHQUAKES REPRESENTED A REVOLT OF THE POPULACE AGAINST THE ELITE ESTABLISHMENT.
Then the Elite started talking about their low opinion of the judgement of the voters. They even tried to play the “Race Card”. But you can’t write off millions of voters by using the over-worked race card.”
“So Tom, what needs to be done?”
“In my mind, Democracy has to be lived more than once every election.
We need to defend democratic principles instead of it being a case of “too much democracy”, there is at the moment far too little democracy.”
“I think the Establishment are trying to take the people out of Democracy, by saying: The people are ignorant, the people are irrational, the people are gullible and finally the people don’t know what’s good for them.”
“So, the Elite,” Tom said soberly,” think it’s better to leave the big issues to them, they know what’s best for the people. They are the “experts.”
“The political debates on TV are over-rehearsed and empty.
The electorate is reduced to the role of passive spectator.
Local public debates in town halls is a lost art, it should be revived.
Maybe there could be more debates on the internet.”
“All good points, Dave. One argument against popular democracy is that voters are at the mercy of the Media. Much of the top echelon of the Media Empires are now seen as part of the Elite. The people listen exclusively to the Media and are unduly influenced by them is a Myth.
Trump was elected despite being vilified by the Media. He won the election though he only was supported by two major newspapers.”
“Right on Tom, the media reflects the issues of the day, it doesn’t dictate them.
It reflects public life and it helps to shape our perception of it, but we don’t have to be totally influenced by it. We can think for ourselves.”
“Tom, I believe political power is exercised from on high by an insulated political class. What’s to be done?”
“Dave, I believe we need MORE debate and participation in the Democratic process. We need to put the people back at the heart of Democracy.”
“We need to go over the basics of democratic freedom, because these basics are glossed over and forgotten in a world where everybody pays lip service to Democracy in principle while trying to deny it in practice.”
“Okay Tom, lets list some of the basics. I’ll start with:
Direct Democracy where the culture is infused with public debate, town hall style, where the people’s will is paramount. Maybe more debates on the internet where the Elite would read and listen to it and pay attention.”
“I’d like to talk about the Masses, Dave. This is the group that you and I are in and which the Elite look down on as a mob of deplorables. It’s called Mass-Bashing.”
When it comes to making political decisions the wisdom of the Masses is better than the narrow view of the “experts”. The Masses bring real life experience to the table.”
“How about this: Don’t out source authority over major issues to unelected judges.
Unelected judges should NOT sit in judgement of political issues affecting the whole of society. These issues need the widest public debate.”
“The Elite want to beat us into conformity and they want us to believe they are the experts.”
“So, in conclusion, we need to put the people (demos) back in Democracy and give them the power and control (kratos) to make informed choices through public debates that our officials listen to and act upon. I’ll leave you with this:
AN EXPERT CAN TAKE SOMETHING YOU ALREADY KNOW AND MAKE IT SOUND CONFUSING.”